On the origin and diversity of Newcastle disease virus in Tanzania

Free-range rural chickens (FRCs) dominate the poultry industry in developing countries and chickens are exposed to multi-host infections, including Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The knowledge about the characteristics of NDV from FRCs is limited. This study investigated the persistence, spread and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOnderstepoort journal of veterinary research Vol. 78; no. 1; p. 312
Main Authors Yongolo, Mmeta G, Christensen, Henrik, Handberg, Kurt, Minga, Uswege, Olsen, John E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published South Africa ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute - Agricultural Research Council 01.01.2011
AOSIS
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Free-range rural chickens (FRCs) dominate the poultry industry in developing countries and chickens are exposed to multi-host infections, including Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The knowledge about the characteristics of NDV from FRCs is limited. This study investigated the persistence, spread and risks of NDV from FRCs. NDV isolates (n = 21) from unvaccinated FRCs in Tanzania were characterised by conventional intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) and sequence analysis of a partial region of the deduced fusion protein encompassing the cleavage site. Results showed that five isolates were screened as lentogenic, nine as mesogenic and six as velogenic. Phylogenetic analysis of the 21 isolates compared to reference sequences revealed three, four, nine and five isolates in genotypes 1, 2, 3c and 4a, respectively. Genotype 3c also included published sequences of Tanzanian isolates obtained from exotic birds and chicken isolates from Uganda. The analysis showed that NDV were persistently present among chicken populations and possibly spread through live chicken markets or migration of wild birds. Differences in amino acid sequences detected around the cleavage site separated the isolates in six types. However, cleavage site pattern could not fully differentiate mesogenic isolates from velogenic isolates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-2465
2219-0635
2219-0635
DOI:10.4102/ojvr.v78i1.312