A Phase II Trial of Prexasertib (LY2606368) in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

This study assessed the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). This was a parallel-cohort phase II study of 105 mg/m2 prexasertib once every 14 days for patients who progressed after no more than two prior therapies and had platin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical lung cancer Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 531 - 540
Main Authors Byers, Lauren Averett, Navarro, Alejandro, Schaefer, Eric, Johnson, Melissa, Özgüroğlu, Mustafa, Han, Ji-Youn, Bondarenko, Igor, Cicin, Irfan, Dragnev, Konstantin H., Abel, Adam, Wang, Xuejing, McNeely, Samuel, Hynes, Scott, Lin, Aimee Bence, Forster, Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study assessed the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). This was a parallel-cohort phase II study of 105 mg/m2 prexasertib once every 14 days for patients who progressed after no more than two prior therapies and had platinum-sensitive (Cohort 1) or platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory (Cohort 2) disease. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker identification and assessment of an alternative regimen (Cohort 3: 40 mg/m2 days 1-3, 14-day cycle). In Cohort 1 (n = 58), ORR was 5.2%; DCR, 31%; median PFS, 1.41 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.64); and median OS, 5.42 months (95% CI, 3.75-8.51). In Cohort 2 (n = 60), ORR was 0%; DCR, 20%; median PFS, 1.36 months (95% CI, 1.25-1.45); and median OS, 3.15 months (95% CI, 2.27-5.52). The most frequent all-grade, related, treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (Cohort 1, 69.6%; Cohort 2, 73.3%), decreased platelet count (Cohort 1, 51.8%; Cohort 2, 50.0%), decreased white blood cell count (Cohort 1, 28.6%; Cohort 2, 40.0%), and anemia (Cohort 1, 39.3%; Cohort 2, 28.3%). Eleven patients (19.6%) in Cohort 1 and one patient (1.7%) in Cohort 2 experienced grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia. Prexasertib pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior studies. Cohort 3 outcomes were similar to those of Cohorts 1 and 2. No actionable biomarkers were identified. Prexasertib did not demonstrate activity to warrant future development as monotherapy in ED-SCLC. Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) need improved outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting. This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of prexasertib, a checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, in platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory ED-SCLC. Prexasertib demonstrated response rates of 5.2% in platinum-sensitive and 0% in platinum-refractory ED-SCLC. Prexasertib did not show prespecified efficacy as monotherapy in ED-SCLC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1525-7304
1938-0690
DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.04.005