Prephonological spelling and its connections with later word reading and spelling performance

•Some preschool children write words in ways that do not make sense based on sound.•Prephonological spellings reveal some knowledge of graphotactics: how letters combine.•These spellings do not necessarily reflect lack of alphabet knowledge or phonological awareness.•Prephonological spelling near th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental child psychology Vol. 218; p. 105359
Main Authors Treiman, Rebecca, Kessler, Brett, Pollo, Tatiana Cury
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Some preschool children write words in ways that do not make sense based on sound.•Prephonological spellings reveal some knowledge of graphotactics: how letters combine.•These spellings do not necessarily reflect lack of alphabet knowledge or phonological awareness.•Prephonological spelling near the end of preschool presages poorer reading and spelling later on. Before children are able to invent phonologically plausible spellings of words, they may produce strings of letters that do not seem to be motivated by the sounds in words. To examine the nature of these prephonological spellings and their relationship to later literacy performance, we administered a test in which children spelled a series of words using preformed letters, together with other literacy-related tests, to 106 U.S. 3- to 5-year-olds who had not received formal literacy instruction. We then followed the children into the first years of school, administering standardized spelling and word reading tests yearly for the subsequent 3 years. We used quantitative procedures to identify children who were prephonological spellers at Time 1. Although these children did not use phonologically plausible letters at a rate above that expected by chance, their spellings demonstrated some knowledge about common letters and digrams—graphotactic knowledge. The prephonological spellers also showed some knowledge of the alphabet and some phonological awareness, indicating that these skills do not suffice for phonological spelling. Children who were prephonological spellers at Time 1 were poorer readers and spellers at the later testing points, on average, than children who were not. This result reveals the continuity between children’s early spelling attempts and their later literacy skills and the importance of phonology in spelling. We did not find, as Kessler et al. [Journal of Learning Disabilities (2013), Vol. 46, pp. 252–259] did in a study where children wrote words by hand, that better graphotactic knowledge among prephonological spellers is associated with better spelling during later years.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0965
1096-0457
DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105359