Robustness of post-reconstruction and direct kinetic parameter estimates under rigid head motion in dynamic brain PET imaging

• Published in: Physica medica Vol. 53; pp. 40 - 55
• Main Authors: Kotasidis, F.A., Angelis, G.I., Anton-Rodriguez, J.M., Zaidi, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Italy Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2018
• Subjects: Brain imaging; Head motion; Kinetic modelling; Parameter estimation; PET; Parameter estimation; Brain imaging; Kinetic modelling; PET; Head motion
• ISSN: 1120-1797; 1724-191X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.08.006

•Inter-frame motion can disrupt TACs, leading to erroneous parametric maps.•A variety of clinically observed motion patterns were realistically simulated.•4-D reconstruction sensitive to motion, with parameter bias spatially propagating.•Kinetic parameter bias heavily depends on the time point of motion initiation.•Important during prolonged data acquisition in neuro-receptor imaging studies. Dynamic PET imaging is extensively used in brain imaging to estimate parametric maps. Inter-frame motion can substantially disrupt the voxel-wise time-activity curves (TACs), leading to erroneous maps during kinetic modelling. Therefore, it is important to characterize the robustness of kinetic parameters under various motion and kinetic model related factors. Fully 4D brain simulations ([15O]H2O and [18F]FDG dynamic datasets) were performed using a variety of clinically observed motion patterns. Increasing levels of head motion were investigated as well as varying temporal frames of motion initiation. Kinetic parameter estimation was performed using both post-reconstruction kinetic analysis and direct 4D image reconstruction to assess bias from inter-frame emission blurring and emission/attenuation mismatch. Kinetic parameter bias heavily depends on the time point of motion initiation. Motion initiated towards the end of the scan results in the most biased parameters. For the [18F]FDG data, k4 is the more sensitive parameter to positional changes, while K1 and blood volume were proven to be relatively robust to motion. Direct 4D image reconstruction appeared more sensitive to changes in TACs due to motion, with parameter bias spatially propagating and depending on the level of motion. Kinetic parameter bias highly depends upon the time frame at which motion occurred, with late frame motion-induced TAC discontinuities resulting in the least accurate parameters. This is of importance during prolonged data acquisition as is often the case in neuro-receptor imaging studies. In the absence of a motion correction, use of TOF information within 4D image reconstruction could limit the error propagation.