Bioequivalence of two tacrolimus 1-mg formulations under fasting conditions in healthy subjects: A randomized, two-period crossover trial
The present study compared the pharmacokinetics of two (1 mg) tacrolimus formulations (test (generic from Panacea) and reference (innovator from Astellas)) after a single-dose administration as per the European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines to grant marketing authorization. This study was a rando...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 183 - 193 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Dustri - Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle GmbH & Co. KG
01.03.2020
Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The present study compared the pharmacokinetics of two (1 mg) tacrolimus formulations (test (generic from Panacea) and reference (innovator from Astellas)) after a single-dose administration as per the European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines to grant marketing authorization.
This study was a randomized, open-label, balanced, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequences, single-dose, truncated-area, crossover design with a washout period of 19 days between the phases. Healthy subjects aged 18 - 45 years (both inclusive) were included. Eligible subjects received a single oral dose of 5 × 1-mg capsule of tacrolimus either test or reference formulation. Blood samples were collected until 72.00 hours postdose, and peak concentration (C
) and area under the curve (AUC
) were evaluated in whole blood using validated LC-MS/MS. Safety was also assessed in each period.
Of 56 subjects enrolled, 52 completed both study periods. The arithmetic mean (SD) C
for the reference and test formulations was 40.62 (11.30) and 46.20 (10.73) ng/mL, and AUC
was 348.34 (156.41) and 361.04 (158.71) ng×h/mL, respectively. The geometric least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval (CI)) was 115.07% (90% CI: 109.81, 120.59) for C
and 103.78 (90% CI: 97.40, 110.58) for AUC
, which fell within the acceptance range as per EMA guidelines for narrow therapeutic index drugs (C
: 80.00 - 125.00%; AUC: 90.00 - 111.11%). No serious adverse event was observed.
The generic tacrolimus was bioequivalent to the reference formulation, was well tolerated, and provides a well-acceptable alternative to the reference drug. Switching treatment to generic tacrolimus medication may reduce the cost and economic burden of treating transplanted patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0946-1965 |
DOI: | 10.5414/CP203534 |