Mid-Career Research Training for the Generalist Physician: Case Study of a Balancing Act

Background: Although generalist physician faculty typically lack the skills needed to conduct research, few medical schools offer on-site faculty development programs that teach research skills. Description: To address this dilemma, our medical school introduced a part-time Primary Care Research Fel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTeaching and learning in medicine Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 180 - 185
Main Authors Brand, Donald A., Patrick, Patricia A., Grayson, Martha S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis Group 01.04.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Although generalist physician faculty typically lack the skills needed to conduct research, few medical schools offer on-site faculty development programs that teach research skills. Description: To address this dilemma, our medical school introduced a part-time Primary Care Research Fellowship offering full-day classes once a week over 10 months. Evaluation: We asked the 22 general internists, general pediatricians, and family physicians who participated in the program to rate their experience, and we measured their research productivity during the 3 years before and 3 years after completing the program, using a group of matched controls for comparison. Participants rated the program highly and increased their aggregate research productivity from 1 publication before completing the program to 6 publications afterward, although this increase did not reach statistical significance ( p = .09). Controls exhibited substantially higher baseline productivity than fellows (10 publications vs. 1 publication, p = .03), but controls' productivity changed little between the first and second measurement periods (10 and 7 publications, respectively). Conclusion: Our mid-career research training program enabled primary care academic faculty to gain confidence in their ability to conduct a scientific study with minimal disruption to their teaching and clinical activities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1040-1334
1532-8015
DOI:10.1080/10401330801991899