Object focus marking in Spanish: An investigation using three tasks
The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final...
Saved in:
Published in | Glossa (London) Vol. 5; no. 1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Open Library of Humanities
17.07.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2397-1835 2397-1835 |
DOI | 10.5334/gjgl.1160 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The literature on focus in Spanish contains a divide between theoretical claims and quantitative empirical evidence: While Spanish is often regarded as resorting to syntactic movement to mark focus, quantitative and/or experimental data often do not support this claim. Research focusing on non-final objects within the VP can provide valuable clarity to the empirical picture, especially when evidence is gathered using multiple methods, a practice known as triangulation. In this article, we use three different tasks (judgments, sentence processing, and production) to provide evidence of object focus marking in Spanish. We found that: (i) canonical orders (object in-situ) were preferred overall; (ii) marking object focus via movement strategies is possible—we find a relationship between object-focus marking and non-canonical (S)VPPO order, as predicted by mainstream syntactic accounts; and (iii) Spanish focus is not marked asymmetrically by position (subjects vs. non-subjects). Overall, results show canonical orders (i.e., SVOPP) can be used to realize focus on any constituent, while their non-canonical counterparts are contextually restricted. This finding suggests mainstream syntactic accounts in which information structure triggers syntactic movement may need to be revised to include alternative focus-marking mechanisms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2397-1835 2397-1835 |
DOI: | 10.5334/gjgl.1160 |