Small static radiosurgery field dosimetry with small volume ionization chambers

•10 FFF Varian TrueBeam Monte Carlo model was presented.•6 and 10 FFF 5 mm field dosimetry correction factors were simulated and validated.•Careful evaluation of correction factor uncertainties was carried out.•IBA RAZOR Nano Chamber showed excellent behavior as small field reference detector. To ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysica medica Vol. 97; pp. 66 - 72
Main Authors López-Sánchez, Miguel, Pérez-Fernández, María, Pardo, Eduardo, Fandiño, José M, Teijeiro, Antonio, Gómez-Fernández, Nicolás, Gómez, Faustino, González-Castaño, Diego M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•10 FFF Varian TrueBeam Monte Carlo model was presented.•6 and 10 FFF 5 mm field dosimetry correction factors were simulated and validated.•Careful evaluation of correction factor uncertainties was carried out.•IBA RAZOR Nano Chamber showed excellent behavior as small field reference detector. To evaluate the response of the four smallest active volume thimble type ionization chambers commercially available (IBA-dosimetry RAZOR Nano Chamber, Standard Imaging Exradin A16, IBA-dosimetry CC01 and PTW T31022) when measuring SRS cone collimated Flattening Filter Free (FFF) fields. We employed Monte Carlo simulation for calculating correction factors as defined in IAEA TRS-483. Monte Carlo simulation beam model and ion chamber geometry definitions were supported by an extensive set of measurements. Type A and B uncertainty components were evaluated. Commissioning of Monte Carlo 6 MV and 10 MV FFF beam models yielded relative differences between measured and simulated dose distributions lower than 1.5%. Monte Carlo simulated output factors for 5 mm SRS field agree with experimental values within 1% local relative difference for all chambers. Smallest active volume ion chamber (IBA-dosimetry RAZOR Nano Chamber) exhibits smallest correction, being compatible with unity. Correction factor combined uncertainties range between 0.7% and 0.9%. Smallest uncertainties were recorded for smallest and largest active volume ion chambers, although the latter exhibited largest correction factor. Highest contribution to combined uncertainty was type B component associated with beam model initial electron spatial Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) uncertainty. Among the investigated chambers, the IBA RAZOR Nano Chamber was found to be an excellent choice for narrow beam output factor measurement since it requires minimum correction (in line with IAEA TRS-483 recommendations). This is caused by its tiny size and tissue equivalence materials which produce minimum volume averaging and fluence perturbation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.04.002