Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility
This research was conducted to assess how guilt appeals operate in soliciting charitable donations. It was hypothesized that a sense of responsibility would enhance the effectiveness of charitable guilt appeals, thus leading to larger charitable donations. It was also hypothesized that the presence...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychology & marketing Vol. 23; no. 12; pp. 1035 - 1054 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.12.2006
Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This research was conducted to assess how guilt appeals operate in soliciting charitable donations. It was hypothesized that a sense of responsibility would enhance the effectiveness of charitable guilt appeals, thus leading to larger charitable donations. It was also hypothesized that the presence of others would make salient a prosocial norm, thus increasing a sense of responsibility to help. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to test these hypotheses. The effect of guilt on charitable‐donation intention and actual donations was mediated by a sense of responsibility. Additionally, the presence of others enhanced the sense of responsibility to behave prosocially. These findings have implications for the design of charitable‐donation campaigns. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-0KK0J8PF-J ArticleID:MAR20145 istex:F8EA85CF99B1B894634FDEC2D80527224BE5D3B8 |
ISSN: | 0742-6046 1520-6793 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mar.20145 |