Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility

This research was conducted to assess how guilt appeals operate in soliciting charitable donations. It was hypothesized that a sense of responsibility would enhance the effectiveness of charitable guilt appeals, thus leading to larger charitable donations. It was also hypothesized that the presence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychology & marketing Vol. 23; no. 12; pp. 1035 - 1054
Main Authors Basil, Debra Z., Ridgway, Nancy M., Basil, Michael D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.2006
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This research was conducted to assess how guilt appeals operate in soliciting charitable donations. It was hypothesized that a sense of responsibility would enhance the effectiveness of charitable guilt appeals, thus leading to larger charitable donations. It was also hypothesized that the presence of others would make salient a prosocial norm, thus increasing a sense of responsibility to help. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to test these hypotheses. The effect of guilt on charitable‐donation intention and actual donations was mediated by a sense of responsibility. Additionally, the presence of others enhanced the sense of responsibility to behave prosocially. These findings have implications for the design of charitable‐donation campaigns. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-0KK0J8PF-J
ArticleID:MAR20145
istex:F8EA85CF99B1B894634FDEC2D80527224BE5D3B8
ISSN:0742-6046
1520-6793
DOI:10.1002/mar.20145