The Benchmarking Strategy Has a Role to Play Across Cultures
This article responds to the commentary by Cardemil () on our original article (Spilka & Dobson, ), in which we proposed the use of a benchmarking strategy to evaluate culturally adapted and transported treatments. We address Cardemil's assertion that a culturally embedded or bottom‐up appr...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 82 - 84 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article responds to the commentary by Cardemil () on our original article (Spilka & Dobson, ), in which we proposed the use of a benchmarking strategy to evaluate culturally adapted and transported treatments. We address Cardemil's assertion that a culturally embedded or bottom‐up approach to the development of models of psychopathology and treatment of disorders is optimal and argue that benchmarking provides an alternative model in which treatments may also be developed in one culture and exported, with appropriate adaptation and evaluation, to another. We discuss the circumstances in which benchmarking is likely to have enhanced benefit and argue that this issue should be addressed with research and evidence as part of the global efforts toward evidence‐based practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:1E371DC6B6105D2890CF530F394AF5E51625191D ark:/67375/WNG-ZSNVPX14-R ArticleID:CPSP12094 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0969-5893 1468-2850 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cpsp.12094 |