The difficult relationship between occlusal interferences and temporomandibular disorder - insights from animal and human experimental studies

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 279 - 295
• Main Authors: Xie, Q., Li, X., Xu, X.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2013
• Subjects: animal; Animals; Cartilage, Articular - pathology; Dental Occlusion, Traumatic - complications; Disease Models, Animal; human; Humans; Malocclusion - complications; Masticatory Muscles - innervation; Neural Pathways - physiopathology; Nociceptive Pain - etiology; occlusion; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; temporomandibular disorder; Temporomandibular Joint - blood supply; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - psychology
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/joor.12034

Summary The aetiology of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is multifactorial, and numerous studies have addressed that occlusion may be of great importance. However, whether occlusion plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of TMD remains controversial. Study designs utilising animal models have been used to study the effects of artificial occlusal alterations. Experimental traumatic occlusion affects blood flow in the temporomandibular joint and results in changes in the condylar cartilage, and artificial occlusal interference induces masticatory muscle nociceptive responses that are associated with peripheral sensitisation and lead to central sensitisation, which maintains masticatory muscle hyperalgesia. The possibility that occlusal interference results in TMD has been investigated in humans using a double‐blind randomised design. Subjects without a history of TMD show fairly good adaptation to interferences. In contrast, subjects with a history of TMD develop a significant increase in clinical signs and self‐report stronger symptoms (occlusal discomfort and chewing difficulties) in response to interferences. Meanwhile, psychological factors appear meaningful for symptomatic responses to artificial interferences in subjects with a history of TMD. Thus, individual differences in vulnerability to occlusal interferences do exist. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to using human and animal occlusal interference models, these approaches are indispensable for discovering the role of occlusion in TMD pathogenesis.