Arsenic speciation in some environmental samples: a comparative study of HG-GC-QFAAS and HPLC-ICP-MS methods

Some water and soil extracts polluted with arsenic, and a sewage sludge certified for total arsenic have been analysed by high‐performance liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (HPLC–ICP–MS) and hydride generation–gas chromatography– quartz furnace atomic absorption spec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied organometallic chemistry Vol. 14; no. 8; pp. 401 - 410
Main Authors Guerin, T., Molenat, N., Astruc, A., Pinel, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.08.2000
Wiley
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Some water and soil extracts polluted with arsenic, and a sewage sludge certified for total arsenic have been analysed by high‐performance liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (HPLC–ICP–MS) and hydride generation–gas chromatography– quartz furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (HG–GC–QFAAS techniques.) Detection limits in the range of 200–400 and 2–10 ng l−1 respectively allowed the determination of inorganic [As(III), As(V)] and methylated (DMA, MMA, TMAO) arsenic species present in these samples. Results obtained by both methods are well correlated overall, whatever the arsenic chemical form and concentration range (8–10 000 μg l−1). Comparison of these results enabled us to point out features and disadvantages of each analytical method and to reach a conclusion that they are suitable for arsenic speciation in these environmental matrices. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:CF6D179D9734F0176F6E940D17334E8115843328
ArticleID:AOC21
ark:/67375/WNG-BG36H4H7-9
ISSN:0268-2605
1099-0739
DOI:10.1002/1099-0739(200008)14:8<401::AID-AOC21>3.0.CO;2-Y