Reliability of Radiomic Features Across Multiple Abdominal CT Image Acquisition Settings: A Pilot Study Using ACR CT Phantom

• Published in: Tomography (Ann Arbor) Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 226 - 231
• Main Authors: Lu, Lin, Liang, Yongguang, Schwartz, Lawrence H, Zhao, Binsheng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Grapho Publications, LLC 01.03.2019
• Subjects: Algorithms; Humans; Phantoms, Imaging; Pilot Projects; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiography, Abdominal - methods; Radiography, Abdominal - standards; Reproducibility of Results; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards; Reliability; Radiomic Features; quantitative imaging biomarkers; Abdominal CT
• ISSN: 2379-139X; 2379-1381; 2379-139X
• DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00005

We studied the reliability of radiomic features on abdominal computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with multiple CT image acquisition settings using the ACR (American College of Radiology) CT Phantom. Twenty-four sets of CT images of the ACR CT phantom were attained from a GE Discovery 750HD scanner using 24 different image acquisition settings, combinations of 4 tube currents (25, 50, 100, 200 Effective mAs), 3 slice thicknesses (1.25, 2.5, 5 mm), and 2 convolution kernels (STANDARD and SOFT). Polyethylene (-95 HU) and acrylic (120 HU) of the phantom model were selected for calculating real feature value; a noise-free, computer-generated phantom image series that reproduced the 2 objects and the background was used for calculating reference feature value. Feature reliability was defined as the degree of predicting reference feature value from real feature value. Radiomic features gray-level co-occurrence matrix ( ) y were investigated. The value of ≥ 0.85 was considered to be of high reliability. The reliability of and were high across all image acquisition settings. At 200 Effective mAs, all features except showed high reliability, whereas at 25 Effective mAs, most features (except and ) showed low reliability. From high to low, reliability was ranked in the following order: , , and . CT image acquisition settings affected the reliability of radiomic features. High reliable features were attained from images reconstructed at high tube current and thick slice thickness.