Charge distribution and transport properties in reduced ceria phases: A review

• Published in: The Journal of physics and chemistry of solids Vol. 72; no. 12; pp. 1482 - 1494
• Main Authors: Shoko, E., Smith, M.F., McKenzie, Ross H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2011
• Subjects: A. Electronic materials; A. Oxides; Adiabatic flow; Cerium oxide; Charge distribution; D. Defects; D. Electrical conductivity; D. Transport properties; Devices; Electronics; Mathematical models; Phases; Polarons; A. Electronic materials; D. Transport properties; A. Oxides; D. Defects; D. Electrical conductivity
• ISSN: 0022-3697; 1879-2553
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.09.002

The question of the charge distribution in reduced ceria phases (CeO 2− x ) is important for understanding the microscopic physics of oxygen storage capacity, and the electronic and ionic conductivities in these materials. All these are key properties in the application of these materials in catalysis and electrochemical devices. Several approaches have been applied to study this problem, including ab initio methods. Recently [1], we applied the bond valence model (BVM) to discuss the charge distribution in several different crystallographic phases of reduced ceria. Here, we compare the BVM results to those from atomistic simulations to determine if there is consistency in the predictions of the two approaches. Our analysis shows that the two methods give a consistent picture of the charge distribution around oxygen vacancies in bulk reduced ceria phases. We then review the transport theory applicable to reduced ceria phases, providing useful relationships which enable comparison of experimental results obtained by different techniques. In particular, we compare transport parameters obtained from the observed optical absorption spectrum, α ( ω ) , dc electrical conductivity with those predicted by small polaron theory and the Harrison method. The small polaron energy is comparable to that estimated from α ( ω ) . However, we found a discrepancy between the value of the electron hopping matrix element, t, estimated from the Marcus–Hush formula and that obtained by the Harrison method. Part of this discrepancy could be attributed to the system lying in the crossover region between adiabatic and nonadiabatic whereas our calculations assumed the system to be nonadiabatic. Finally, by considering the relationship between the charge distribution and electronic conductivity, we suggest the possibility of low temperature metallic conductivity for intermediate phases, i.e., x ∼ 0.3 . This has not yet been experimentally observed. ► A consistent picture of charge distribution in bulk reduced ceria is obtained. ► Reduced ceria transport parameters analysed using different theoretical models. ► Possible low-temperature metallic conductivity in Ce 7O 12.