A multi-centre retrospective review of second-line therapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Introduction Limited information on second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is available. At time of first-line treatment failure, approximately half of the patients are candidates for further treatment. Material and methods A retrospective review of 183 patients submitted t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 673 - 678
Main Authors Reni, M., Berardi, R., Mambrini, A., Pasetto, L., Cereda, S., Ferrari, V. D., Cascinu, S., Cantore, M., Mazza, E., Grisanti, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.09.2008
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Limited information on second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is available. At time of first-line treatment failure, approximately half of the patients are candidates for further treatment. Material and methods A retrospective review of 183 patients submitted to second-line therapy has been performed to identify prognostic factors, provides useful information for patients counseling and generates hypotheses for future studies. Inclusion criteria were: cytological or histologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and prior gemcitabine-including chemotherapy. Any age, performance status (PS) and chemotherapy regimen were considered. Results One hundred and eighty-three patients (106 males; 168 metastatic; median age 62 years; median PS 1; 63 submitted to prior curative surgery, 32 to prior radiotherapy) with a median previous progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.7 months were included. Median and 6-month PFS after initiation of salvage therapy were 3.0 months and 20%. Median, 1 and 2 years, overall survival after initiation of salvage therapy were 6.2 months, 17 and 4%, respectively. Previous PFS, CA19.9 levels and age independently predicted OS. Conclusion Re-challenge with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil administration may have a role in selected patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-007-0653-y