Is there a consensus between clinical practice guidelines for conventional and molecular nuclear medicine studies in parathyroid pathology?

Hyperparathyroidism is a common calcium metabolic disorder, characterized by the presence of high concentrations or inappropriately normal concentrations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the context of high calcium. Pharmacological and surgical management is available as treatment. The objective of d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of nuclear medicine Vol. 35; no. 9; pp. 994 - 1003
Main Authors Acuña Hernandez, Marylin, Sanchez Orduz, Liset, Cancino Ramos, Uvi, Vallejo Armenta, Paola, Cadavid Blanco, Leonardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Singapore 01.09.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hyperparathyroidism is a common calcium metabolic disorder, characterized by the presence of high concentrations or inappropriately normal concentrations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the context of high calcium. Pharmacological and surgical management is available as treatment. The objective of diagnostic imaging is to determine the location of the causal lesion. For these purposes, non-invasive methods can be divided into anatomical or functional studies, with nuclear medicine studies being in the latter category. The objective of this review, is to establish the similarities and differences that exist in the clinical practice guidelines on conventional and molecular nuclear medicine studies in parathyroid disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-021-01658-9