Is there a consensus between clinical practice guidelines for conventional and molecular nuclear medicine studies in parathyroid pathology?
Hyperparathyroidism is a common calcium metabolic disorder, characterized by the presence of high concentrations or inappropriately normal concentrations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the context of high calcium. Pharmacological and surgical management is available as treatment. The objective of d...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of nuclear medicine Vol. 35; no. 9; pp. 994 - 1003 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Singapore
Springer Singapore
01.09.2021
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Hyperparathyroidism is a common calcium metabolic disorder, characterized by the presence of high concentrations or inappropriately normal concentrations of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the context of high calcium. Pharmacological and surgical management is available as treatment. The objective of diagnostic imaging is to determine the location of the causal lesion. For these purposes, non-invasive methods can be divided into anatomical or functional studies, with nuclear medicine studies being in the latter category. The objective of this review, is to establish the similarities and differences that exist in the clinical practice guidelines on conventional and molecular nuclear medicine studies in parathyroid disease. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0914-7187 1864-6433 1864-6433 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12149-021-01658-9 |