Fixed-dose Combination of Dapagliflozin and Linagliptin in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Metformin: A Randomized Double-blind Multicenter Trial

Abstract Context: Combining dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in therapy could be beneficial for those with metformin intolerance or not achieving adequate control. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of diabetology Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 50 - 56
Main Authors Kumthekar, Prashant, Upadhyay, Mihir R., Tamma, Rajasekhara Reddy, Kranti, Vijay, Bhattacharya, Raja, Sharma, Prabhat Kumar, Barge, Vijaykumar Bhagwan, Revankar, Santosh, Ghatge, Shweta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2025
Edition3
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Context: Combining dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in therapy could be beneficial for those with metformin intolerance or not achieving adequate control. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin plus linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on metformin. Settings and Design: It is a phase III, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Materials and Methods: Patients with T2DM, with a stable dose of metformin ≥1000 mg/day as monotherapy for at least 3 months before screening, with inadequate glycemic control at screening were randomly assigned to either arm A (dapagliflozin 10 mg + linagliptin 5 mg) or arm B (linagliptin 5 mg) in a 1:1 ratio. Statistical Analysis Used: The primary and secondary efficacy endpoint analyses were done using repeated measures analysis of covariance or a two-sample t test. All safety parameters were analyzed using a two-sample t test and descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 232 patients were randomized in arm A (n = 112) and arm B (n = 110). At week 16, arm A showed a significant mean reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) than arm B (−1.35% vs. −0.92%; P≤0.0001). Similarly, the mean reductions in fasting plasma glucose (−26.13 mg/dL vs. −22.59 mg/dL; P = 0.0492), 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (−52.29 mg/dL vs. −30.35 mg/dL; P≤0.0001), and body weight (−1.32 kg vs. −0.42 kg; P≤0.0001) were significantly higher in arm A than in arm B. Arm A had a higher proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (42.24% vs. 22.41%; P = 0.0012). Adverse events were comparable between study arms. Conclusions: The FDC of dapagliflozin and linagliptin was superior in terms of improvement in glycemic control and a higher proportion of patients achieving target HbA1c level, with both treatment arms being well-tolerated.
ISSN:2543-3288
2078-7685
DOI:10.4103/jod.jod_169_24