Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust

We tested a model in which two bases of trust mediated the effects of supervisory procedural justice. Two conceptually distinct mechanisms were proposed to explain how different procedural justice effects are manifested. Structural equation modeling results using 203 individuals with matched supervi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Leadership quarterly Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 143 - 154
Main Authors Yang, Jixia, Mossholder, Kevin W., Peng, T.K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Inc 01.04.2009
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Affective trust
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive trust
Mathematical models
Organizational behavior
Procedural justice
Studies
Supervisors
Trust
Taiwan
Procedural justice
Affective trust
Cognitive trust
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:We tested a model in which two bases of trust mediated the effects of supervisory procedural justice. Two conceptually distinct mechanisms were proposed to explain how different procedural justice effects are manifested. Structural equation modeling results using 203 individuals with matched supervisory ratings from a cross-section of organizations located in Taiwan supported our model. Cognitive trust mediated the relations of supervisory procedural justice with performance and job satisfaction, whereas affective trust mediated relations between supervisory procedural justice and helping behavior at work.
ISSN:1048-9843
1873-3409
DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.009