A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site

• Published in: Environmental monitoring and assessment Vol. 192; no. 3; p. 181
• Main Authors: Burger, Joanna, Gochfeld, Michael, Kosson, David S., Brown, Kevin G., Salisbury, Jennifer, Jeitner, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 17.02.2020; Springer Nature B.V; Springer
• Subjects: Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Case studies; Conservation of Natural Resources; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecological risk assessment; Ecology; Ecosystem; Ecotoxicology; Energy policy; Environment; Environmental changes; Environmental cleanup; Environmental Management; Environmental Monitoring; Environmental risk; Environmental science; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Government; Government Agencies; Heterogeneity; Humans; Industry; Land use; Land use management; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis; Pollution control; Protected species; Protection; Remediation; Resource management; Resources; Risk assessment; Risk management; Species diversity; War; Ecological resources; Future land use designations; Habitat mosaics; Assessment; Risk; Resource evaluations; Land use; Post-remediation
• ISSN: 0167-6369; 1573-2959
• DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8084-x

Since the late 1980s, there has been a US federal mandate to clean up contaminated sites remaining from the Second World War, the Cold War, and abandoned industries. One determinant of cleanup standards for remediation is future land use—how will the land be used and by whom? Land use decisions may be consensus documents developed by site owners, state and federal agencies, and local stakeholders. Often there are competing views and/or claims on how remediated sites should be used, including as open or green space. Large sites are likely to have more ecological heterogeneity within similar land use designations because of differences in climate, geology, topography, and history of human use. This paper uses the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site as a case study to examine how and whether future land use designations will protect species, species diversity, heterogeneity, and ecosystems once remediation is complete. The objective of this paper is to describe “future land use designations” on a large, complex site (DOE’s Hanford Site) and to examine the following: (1) how future land use designations were made and have changed over time, (2) how land use designations included the value of ecological resources, (3) how risk evaluations of ecological resources from remediation were made, and (4) how future land use may affect the health and well-being of ecological resources on site in the post-remediation period. The paper provides a paradigm for integrating ecological protection into future land use designations such that rare and sensitive resources are protected throughout the process. The paradigm includes the following: (1) developing future land use designations, (2) defining resource levels (values), (3) relating resource levels to land use designations and management, (4) defining risk evaluations, (5) determining the likelihood that valuable resources will occur on each land use type after remediation, and (6) evaluating the potential risk to those resources that results from activities allowed under future land use designations. The paper discusses the importance of each step, the implications for protection of ecological resources, and the importance of land use designations in the assessment of risk to ecological resources from both continued monitoring and maintenance by DOE (or other land owners) and the activities permitted by the established future land use designations.