Study of the Effect of Route of Administration of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Sprague Dawley Rats

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to ameliorate cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). The present study compares the efficacy of different routes of MSCs administration on kidney damage and regeneration after cisplatin-induced AKI. A single intraperitoneal injection of cisplatin (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of stem cells Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 79 - 89
Main Authors Moustafa, Fatma E, Sobh, Mohamed-A, Abouelkheir, Mohamed, Khater, Youmna, Mahmoud, Khalid, Saad, Mohamed-Ahdy, Sobh, Mohamed A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Society for Stem Cell Research 30.05.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to ameliorate cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). The present study compares the efficacy of different routes of MSCs administration on kidney damage and regeneration after cisplatin-induced AKI. A single intraperitoneal injection of cisplatin (5 mg/kg) was used to induce AKI in 160 rats. MSCs (5×10⁶) were given by either intravenous, intra-arterial or kidney sub capsular injection one day after cisplatin injection. Suitable control groups were included. Rats were sacrificed at 4, 7, 11 and 30 days after cisplatin injection. Kidney function parameters, kidney tissue oxidative stress markers, and scoring for renal tissue injury, regeneration and chronicity were all determined. MSCs by any routes were able to ameliorate kidney function deterioration and renal tissue damage induced by cisplatin. The overall results of the three routes were equal. Differences between the different routes in one parameter were transient and inconsistent with other parameters. Changing the route of MSCs injection does not have a major influence on the outcome. Future evaluation should focus on differences between the routes of administration considering the long term safety.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2005-3606
2005-5447
DOI:10.15283/ijsc.2016.9.1.79