Identifying reference communities in ecological restoration: the use of environmental conditions driving vegetation composition

In restoration ecology, the reference ecosystem represents a key concept which is well defined from a theoretical point of view. In practice, however, selecting reference systems, such as reference plant communities, often lacks clear methodology. In order to facilitate this selection, we provide a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRestoration ecology Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 1445 - 1453
Main Authors Durbecq, Aure, Jaunatre, Renaud, Buisson, Elise, Cluchier, Alexandre, Bischoff, Armin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.11.2020
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In restoration ecology, the reference ecosystem represents a key concept which is well defined from a theoretical point of view. In practice, however, selecting reference systems, such as reference plant communities, often lacks clear methodology. In order to facilitate this selection, we provide a framework based on ecological theory, and more precisely on relationships between vegetation and environmental factors, to identify reference plant communities. The four major steps are: (1) the delimitation of a geographical zone in which habitat types similar to restoration sites occur; (2) the identification of environmental factors structuring non‐degraded plant communities within this geographical zone; (3) the comparison of the environmental factors between non‐degraded and degraded sites; and (4) the selection of the non‐degraded sites most similar to restoration sites in terms of environmental factors to use them as references. We concept‐proved our approach by identifying reference communities using environmental factor combinations for five mountain grassland sites degraded by the construction of a high‐voltage line. In a multivariate analysis of 18 non‐degraded sites, we identified six major environmental factors explaining plant species compositions. A second multivariate analysis including degraded sites provided environmental distances of the 18 non‐degraded to each of the degraded sites. The results demonstrated that the environmentally most similar sites were not necessarily the geographically closest ones. In conclusion, the analysis of regional plant–environment interactions provides an important tool to identify reference communities or source sites for seed transfer if not available adjacent to degraded habitats.
Bibliography:Author contributions: AD, AB, RJ, EB conceived the project; AD, AB, RJ, EB conducted the field surveys; AD conducted the literature review and organized the data; RJ, AD wrote the personalized R functions; AD, RJ, AB analyzed results; AD wrote the first draft; AD, AB, RJ, EB revised and edited the manuscript.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1061-2971
1526-100X
DOI:10.1111/rec.13232