How good are experienced interventional cardiologists in predicting the risk and difficulty of a coronary angioplasty procedure? A prospective study to optimize surgical standby

The prediction of the risk of a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has either been based on coronary lesion morphology or on clinical parameters, but a combined angiographic and clinical risk assessment system has not yet been evaluated prospectively. Five experienced interventionalists...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 257 - 262
Main Authors Brueren, B.R.G., Mast, E.G., Suttorp, M.J., Ernst, J.M.P.G., Bal, E.T., Plokker, H.W.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The prediction of the risk of a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has either been based on coronary lesion morphology or on clinical parameters, but a combined angiographic and clinical risk assessment system has not yet been evaluated prospectively. Five experienced interventionalists categorized 7,144 patients with 10,081 stenoses (1.4 lesion/patient) for both the risk and the difficulty of the procedure. Risk categories are as follows: 1 = low risk; 2 = intermediate risk; 3 = high risk. This division was made for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty planning purposes. Category 1 patients denotes those in whom surgical standby is not required; category 2 patients, surgical standby not required but available within 1 hr; category 3 patients, surgical standby required. Difficulty categories are as follows: 1 = easy lesion; 2 = moderately difficult lesion; 3 = difficult lesion. Success was defined as a reduction of the degree of stenosis to less than 50%, without acute myocardial infarction, emergency redilatation, emergency bypass grafting, or death within 1 week. The procedure was not successful in difficulty category 1 in 1.6%, in category 2 in 3.5%, and in category 3 in 9.9%. Complications occurred in risk category 1 in 3.5%, in category 2 in 5.2%, and in category 3 in 12.4%. All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Experienced cardiologists can well predict the risk and success of a coronary angioplasty procedure. This helps to optimize surgical standby, although even in the lowest‐risk category complications can occur. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:257–262, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-QKL2J4B2-2
ArticleID:CCD1
istex:5A68B7CAB42413DE69A3043F98F8FEE2B8B80AC1
Presented in part at the 16th Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, Berlin, 10-14 September 1994, and the 2nd International Meeting on Interventional Cardiology, Jerusalem, 30 June 30-5 July 1997
Presented in part at the 16th Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, Berlin, 10–14 September 1994, and the 2nd International Meeting on Interventional Cardiology, Jerusalem, 30 June 30–5 July 1997
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199903)46:3<257::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-9