A survey of tourist attitudes to renewable energy supply in Australian hotel accommodation

• Published in: Renewable energy Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 2174 - 2185
• Main Authors: Dalton, G.J., Lockington, D.A., Baldock, T.E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2008; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Attitudes; Barriers; Economic data; Energy; Energy economics; Energy policy; Exact sciences and technology; General, economic and professional studies; Natural energy; NIMBY; Renewable energy supply; Survey; Tourist hotel accommodation; Australia; Oceania; Japan; Tourist hotel accommodation; Attitudes; Survey; Renewable energy supply; NIMBY; Barriers; Social acceptability; Social perception; Tourism; Wind energy; Renewable energy; Solar energy; Electric power production; Willingness to pay; Hotel
• ISSN: 0960-1481; 1879-0682
• DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.016

The results of a survey are presented describing the attitudes of Australian tourists to micro-generation renewable energy supply (RES) for hotel accommodation. The average positive response rate to all questions was above 50%, implying a desire by tourists for environmentally friendly accommodation and renewable energy supply. Tourists indicated that they perceived RES to be reliable and expressed a willingness to cooperate with RES initiatives and possible resultant inconveniences. However, there were mixed opinions with regard to consumer willingness to pay for the product. Of the 49% of respondents who were willing to pay extra for RES, 92% replied they would pay between 1% and 5%. Analysis of the variation in response due to accommodation type revealed a ‘city’ hotel versus ‘eco-resort’ difference. Likewise, a breakdown of responses according to country of origin indicated that Australians had a more positive attitude to RES than overseas visitors, including Japanese and Americans. While no variation in response was detected according to gender, age had a measurable bearing on response, with older guests returning a higher positive response rate. Visual queue questions querying aesthetic opinions and ‘not-in-my-backyard’ (NIMBY) attitude to RES revealed that there was virtually no opposition to photovoltaics. Opinions regarding wind energy conversion systems (WECS) varied with type and location, with rooftop WECS receiving more acceptance than stand-alone varieties. A high level of visual acceptance was shown by respondents for onshore wind farms located close to a tourist accommodation centre, with less enthusiasm for offshore farms. A strong NIMBY attitude to WECS was not observed among Australian or local respondents.