A randomized trial of two home-based exercise programmes to improve functional walking post-stroke

Objective: To estimate the relative effectiveness in improving walking ability and other mobility and health outcomes post-stroke of two home-based exercise programmes – stationary cycling and an exercise and walking programme. Design: An observer-blinded, randomized, pragmatic, trial with repeated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical rehabilitation Vol. 27; no. 7; pp. 659 - 671
Main Authors Mayo, Nancy E, MacKay-Lyons, Marilyn J, Scott, Susan C, Moriello, Carolina, Brophy, James
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.07.2013
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To estimate the relative effectiveness in improving walking ability and other mobility and health outcomes post-stroke of two home-based exercise programmes – stationary cycling and an exercise and walking programme. Design: An observer-blinded, randomized, pragmatic, trial with repeated measures. Setting: Hospital centers in two Canadian cities. Subjects: People within 12 months of acute stroke who were able to walk >10 meters independently and healthy enough to engage in exercise. Interventions: Two dose-equivalent interventions, one involving stationary cycling and the other disability-targeted interventions were tested. Both protocols required daily moderate intensity exercise at home building up to 30 minutes per day. One group exercised on a stationary bicycle, the second group carried out mobility exercises and brisk walking. Main measures: The primary outcome was walking capacity as measured by the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were physical function, role participation, health-related quality of life exercise adherence, and adverse events. Results: The study failed to meet recruitment targets: 87 participants (cycle group, n = 43; exercise group, n = 44) participated. No significant effects of group or time were revealed for the 6MWT, which was approximately 320 m at randomization. A significant effect for role participation was found in favor of the exercise group (global odds ratio (OR) for cycling vs. exercise was 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27–0.95). Change in the 6MWT between highest and lowest adherence categories was statistically significant (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Both programmes were equally effective in maintaining walking capacity after discharge from stroke rehabilitation; or were equally ineffective in improving walking capacity. Clinical Trials Gov number: NCT00786045.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0269-2155
1477-0873
1477-0873
DOI:10.1177/0269215513476312