Epistatic, synthetic, and balancing interactions among tubulin missense mutations affecting neurite growth in Caenorhabditis elegans
Mutations in tubulins affect microtubule (MT) dynamics and functions during neuronal differentiation and their genetic interaction provides insights into the regulation of MT functions. We previously used touch receptor neurons to analyze the cellular impact of tubulin mutations and reported the phe...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular biology of the cell Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 331 - 347 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
The American Society for Cell Biology
15.02.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Mutations in tubulins affect microtubule (MT) dynamics and functions during neuronal differentiation and their genetic interaction provides insights into the regulation of MT functions. We previously used
touch receptor neurons to analyze the cellular impact of tubulin mutations and reported the phenotypes of 67 tubulin missense mutations, categorized into three classes: loss-of-function (
), antimorphic (
), and neomorphic (
) alleles. In this study, we isolated 54 additional tubulin alleles through suppressor screens in sensitized backgrounds that caused excessive neurite growth. These alleles included 32 missense mutations not analyzed before, bringing the total number of mutations in our collection to 99. Phenotypic characterization of these newly isolated mutations identified three new types of alleles: partial
and weak
alleles of
/β-tubulin that had subtle effects and strong
alleles of
/α-tubulin. We also discovered complex genetic interactions among the tubulin mutations, including the suppression of
mutations by intragenic
and
alleles, additive and synthetic effects between
alleles, and unexpected epistasis, in which weaker
alleles masked the effects of stronger
alleles in inducing ectopic neurite growth. We also observed balancing between
and
alleles, whose respective MT-hyperstablizing and -destabilizing effects neutralized each other. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1059-1524 1939-4586 |
DOI: | 10.1091/mbc.E20-07-0492 |