Assessing the long-term impact of public investments in comparative effectiveness research: conceptual framework and lessons learned

• Published in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research Vol. 3; no. 6; p. 657
• Main Authors: Rich, Eugene C, Esposito, Dominick, Kimmey, Laura D, Valenzano, Christal Stone, Yong, Pierre L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.11.2014
• Subjects: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; Comparative Effectiveness Research - economics; Financing, Government - economics; Humans; Medicaid - economics; Medicare - economics; Policy Making; Publications - statistics & numerical data; Research Support as Topic - economics; Social Support; United States; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; United States; evaluation; process; methods; outcome; conceptual framework
• ISSN: 2042-6313
• DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.60

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 directed US$1.1 billion to the US Department of Health and Human Services for support of comparative effectiveness research (CER). As part of this investment, US Department of Health and Human Services commissioned a midstream evaluation of the ARRA CER portfolio. One goal of the evaluation was to identify issues to consider for a future evaluation of the long-term impact of this portfolio and other CER investments. In planning the ARRA CER evaluation, we developed and revised a conceptual framework and related policy research questions that may be useful to future efforts to assess the impact of CER or patient-centered outcomes research investments. In addition, we explored methodological challenges related to designing an evaluation to assess investments in CER that may be informative to any future plans to evaluate the long-term impact of ARRA CER as well subsequent investments made from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund.