Conceptual Design of 20 T Hybrid Accelerator Dipole Magnets

Hybrid magnets are currently under consideration as an economically viable option towards 20 T dipole magnets for next generation of particle accelerators. In these magnets, High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) materials are used in the high field part of the coil with so-called "insert coils...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on applied superconductivity Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors Ferracin, P., Ambrosio, G., Anerella, M., Arbelaez, D., Brouwer, L., Barzi, E., Cooley, L. D., Cozzolino, J., Garcia Fajardo, L., Gupta, R., Juchno, M., Kashikhin, V. V., Kurian, F., Marinozzi, V., Novitski, I., Rochepault, E., Stern, J., Vallone, G., Yahia, B., Zlobin, A.V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.08.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hybrid magnets are currently under consideration as an economically viable option towards 20 T dipole magnets for next generation of particle accelerators. In these magnets, High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) materials are used in the high field part of the coil with so-called "insert coils", and Low Temperature Superconductors (LTS) like Nb 3 Sn and Nb-Ti superconductors are used in the lower field region with so-called "outsert coils". The attractiveness of the hybrid option lays on the fact that, on the one hand, the 20 T field level is beyond the Nb 3 Sn practical limits of 15-16 T for accelerator magnets and can be achieved only via HTS materials; on the other hand, the high cost of HTS superconductors compared to LTS superconductors makes it advantageous exploring a hybrid approach, where the HTS portion of the coil is minimized. We present in this paper an overview of different design options aimed at generating 20 T field in a 50 mm clear aperture. The coil layouts investigated include the Cos-theta design (CT), with its variations to reduce the conductor peak stress, namely the Canted Cos-theta design (CCT) and the Stress Management Cos-theta design (SMCT), and, in addition, the Block-type design (BL) including a form of stress management and the Common-Coil design (CC). Results from a magnetic and mechanical analysis are discussed, with particular focus on the comparison between the different options regarding quantity of superconducting material, field quality, conductor peak stress, and quench protection.
Bibliography:FERMILAB-PUB-22-856-TD; arXiv:2302.04940
AC02-07CH11359; SC0012704; AC02-05CH11231
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
ISSN:1051-8223
1558-2515
DOI:10.1109/TASC.2023.3250382