Midterm results of revision total hip arthroplasty for migrated bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis using cementless cup with the rim-fit technique

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) Vol. 28; no. 3; p. 2309499020954315
• Main Authors: Tanaka, Takeyuki, Kaneko, Taizo, Hidaka, Ryo, Hashikura, Kazuaki, Ishikura, Hisatoshi, Moro, Toru, Tanaka, Sakae
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2020; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Acetabulum - surgery; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods; Female; Femur Head - surgery; Follow-Up Studies; Hemiarthroplasty - methods; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery; Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; bipolar hemiarthroplasty; rim-fit technique; acetabular revision; cementless cup; osteoarthritis
• ISSN: 2309-4990; 1022-5536; 2309-4990
• DOI: 10.1177/2309499020954315

Purpose: The results of reamed bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) are reported to be unfavorable. Acetabular reaming for sufficient bony coverage caused bipolar head migration into the superomedial direction, and most patients required revision surgeries. Several methods are applicable to treat decreased bone stock. This study aimed to investigate the midterm results of revision surgeries using the cementless cup with the rim-fit technique. Methods: Between 1996 and 2014, acetabular revision surgeries using the cementless cup with the rim-fit technique were performed in 86 hips (74 patients). We evaluated radiographic outcomes, including positional change of the rotation center of the artificial femoral head, presence of implant loosening, and filling of the initial gap. We also evaluated clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS), and postoperative complications. Results: The average positional changes from BHA to prerevision surgeries were 8.0 mm superiorly and 4.1 mm medially. The average changes from prerevision to postrevision surgeries were 3.7 mm inferiorly and 2.4 mm laterally. No implant loosening was found in all cases; the initial gap between the acetabular host bone and the acetabular cup was filled in 53 (93%) among 57 hips. The average HHS improved from 65.9 before revision surgeries to 83.8 in the latest follow-up. Dislocation and postoperative periprosthetic fracture occurred in two and five hips, respectively; no cases required rerevision surgeries. Conclusion: There were favorable midterm results of the revision total hip arthroplasty for migrated BHA in patients with hip OA using cementless cup with the rim-fit technique.