Recovery of dietary iron and zinc from the proximal intestine of healthy man: studies of different meals and supplements

The technique of marker perfusion of the upper gastrointestinal tract was used to measure intraluminal quantities of iron and zinc after test meals in healthy humans. Two different meals, one based on hamburger (with a predominance of heme iron, 7.5 mg/meal) and one based on cereal (containing inorg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 33; no. 9; pp. 1946 - 1953
Main Authors Matseshe, J W, Phillips, S F, Malagelada, J R, McCall, J T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.1980
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The technique of marker perfusion of the upper gastrointestinal tract was used to measure intraluminal quantities of iron and zinc after test meals in healthy humans. Two different meals, one based on hamburger (with a predominance of heme iron, 7.5 mg/meal) and one based on cereal (containing inorganic iron; 1.4, 5.3, or 4.6 mg), were used. In addition, the luminal behavior of ferrous sulfate and hydrogen-reduced metallic iron (used as supplements to the cereal meal) were compared. Different meals also contained low (2.4 mg) or high (5.5 mg) amounts of zinc. The intubation technique allowed disappearance of metals from the duodenum and jejunum to be compared. The patterns of luminal flow were different for iron and zinc. Whereas iron was never recovered from the lumen at levels above those ingested in meals, zinc was recovered from the duodenum at levels greater than those ingested. These findings suggest that zinc, but little iron, is added to chyme in the upper gut during digestion and absorption. Bioavailability of different forms of iron, as judged by their luminal disappearance, were similar. Inorganic iron, ferrous sulfate, and hydrogen-reduced metallic iron were absorbed about as effectively as was heme iron. Iron disappeared preferentially from the duodenum but the site of zinc absorption appeared to be more distal.
Bibliography:S20
8033486
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/33.9.1946