Intra-Arterial Therapy as a Rescue Strategy after Clinically Failed Intravenous Thrombolysis May Increase the Likelihood of a Good Outcome in Patients with Severe Ischaemic Stroke A Retrospective Two Centre Study
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial therapy as a rescue strategy after clinically failed intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischaemic stroke patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients treated wit...
Saved in:
Published in | Interventional neuroradiology Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 329 - 335 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.05.2014
Centauro S.r.l |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial therapy as a rescue strategy after clinically failed intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischaemic stroke patients.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with rescue therapy. The results from this study group were compared with those obtained from a control group consisting of 260 consecutive patients treated with IVT alone.
The study group consisted of 52 patients with a mean age of 63 years and a median NIHSS score at admission of 17. Recanalization was achieved in 92% with a symptomatic haemorrhage rate of 9.6%. Rescue patients admitted with a severe stroke (NIHSS score >12) had a significantly better outcome at 90 days compared to patients with the same score but treated with IVT alone. No difference was seen for patients with a lower score at admission.
This study indicates that rescue therapy may increase the proportion of patients with independent outcome if presenting with a severe stroke (NIHSS score >12) without increasing the rate of symptomatic haemorrhage. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1591-0199 2385-2011 1591-0199 |
DOI: | 10.15274/INR-2014-10030 |