Mid‐term results for the retroluminar transobturator sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy
Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Several studies showed encouraging early results of the AdVance® sling. However, mid‐term and long‐term results are missing. We were able to show that the AdVance® sling is also, in a lo...
Saved in:
Published in | BJU international Vol. 108; no. 1; pp. 94 - 98 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2011
Wiley-Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4
What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Several studies showed encouraging early results of the AdVance® sling.
However, mid‐term and long‐term results are missing. We were able to show that the AdVance® sling is also, in a longer follow up (median follow‐up of 27 months), an effective, safe and attractive treatment option with stable results for male SUI after radical prostatectomy.
OBJECTIVE
• To evaluate prospectively the efficacy of the retroluminar transobturator male sling (AdVance® sling) for the functional treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostatectomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
• A total of 137 patients with grade II–IV SUI, resulting from radical prostatectomy, were treated with the AdVance® sling in a prospective clinical study. In all, 11 patients were lost to follow‐up. A total of 17 patients (13.5%) had additional adjuvant radiotherapy before sling implantation.
• Before and after sling implantation, a standardized 1‐h pad test was performed and post‐void residual urine, uroflowmetry, quality‐of‐life scores and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐5) were assessed.
• When calculating the cure and improvement rates, ‘cure’ was defined as no pad use or one dry prophylactic pad; and ‘improved’ was defined as 1–2 pads or reduction of pads ≥50%.
RESULTS
• After a median (range) follow‐up of 27 (20–37) months, and a mean follow‐up of 27.2 months, the success rate was 75.4% with 51.6%‘cured’ and 23.8%‘improved’.
• Overall daily pad use, urine loss in the 1‐h pad test and quality‐of‐life scores improved significantly after sling implantation.
• Compared with 1‐year follow‐up data, no worsening over time was noticed and no additional complications were seen.
CONCLUSION
• With a mid‐term follow‐up, the retroluminar transobturator male sling is an effective, safe and attractive treatment option for SUI after radical prostatectomy. Results are stable over time. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1464-4096 1464-410X 1464-410X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09729.x |