Are Workplace Friendships a Mixed Blessing? Exploring Tradeoffs of Multiplex Relationships and their Associations with Job Performance

Theory and research note the ubiquity of multiplex workplace friendships—multifaceted relationships that superimpose friendship with work‐focused interactions—but it is unclear how they compel or hinder job performance. In a study of insurance company employees (n = 168), we found that the number of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPersonnel psychology Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 311 - 355
Main Authors Methot, Jessica R., Lepine, Jeffery A., Podsakoff, Nathan P., Christian, Jessica Siegel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Durham Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Theory and research note the ubiquity of multiplex workplace friendships—multifaceted relationships that superimpose friendship with work‐focused interactions—but it is unclear how they compel or hinder job performance. In a study of insurance company employees (n = 168), we found that the number of multiplex workplace friendships in one's social network is positively associated with supervisor ratings of job performance. However, we also found that there is a negative indirect effect on job performance through emotional exhaustion, which is offset, in part, through enhanced positive affect. Results of a second study of restaurant and retail sales employees (n = 182) provide greater insight into the positive and negative effects of multiplex workplace friendships. Specifically, these relationships enhanced job performance through trust but detracted from job performance through maintenance difficulty. Collectively, our results illustrate that having a large number of multiplex friendships at work is a mixed blessing. Although the provision and restoration of resources fostered by multiplex relationships benefits employee job performance, these benefits are muted somewhat by the personal resources they deplete.
Bibliography:ArticleID:PEPS12109
istex:24DAED6E909C29F6787DDCA90F8EEE4DD066AD46
ark:/67375/WNG-N8TLJRQ8-H
A previous version of this paper was presented at the Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, April 2010, and the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal, QC, August, 2010. We are grateful to Patrick McKay and Xi Zou for welcome advice on early drafts of this manuscript, Editor Brad Bell, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, and Stan Gully for his input on data analysis issues.
ISSN:0031-5826
1744-6570
DOI:10.1111/peps.12109