Paraoxonase‐1 is only present in traceable amounts in seminal fluid and does not show any relationship with male subfertility

Study Type – Aetiology (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Oxidative stress seems to be one of the biochemical causes of defective sperm function. Paraoxonases are antioxidant enzymes that degrade lipid peroxides. There is a paucity of data on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBJU international Vol. 108; no. 4; pp. 566 - 570
Main Authors Marsillach, Judit, Lafuente, Rafael, Checa, Miguel Angel, Maestre‐Martínez, Carmen, Fabián, Enrique, Brassesco, Mario, Beltrán‐Debón, Raúl, Aragonès, Gerard, Carreras, Ramon, Pedro‐Botet, Juan, Joven, Jorge, Camps, Jordi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2011
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Study Type – Aetiology (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Oxidative stress seems to be one of the biochemical causes of defective sperm function. Paraoxonases are antioxidant enzymes that degrade lipid peroxides. There is a paucity of data on the possible role played by these enzymes in the pathophysiology of male sub‐fertility. The present study shows that testicular tissue of sub‐fertile patients clearly expresses paraoxonases‐1, 2, and 3. These findings suggest a role for these enzymes in the protection against lipid peroxidation inside the cell. However, the concentration and activity of paraoxonase‐1 in semen are negligible and are probably the result of cellular catabolism, with no significant biological function. OBJECTIVE To characterise the immunohistochemical sites of paraoxonase (PON) 1, PON2 and PON3 in human testicular tissue, and to analyse PON1 levels in semen, aiming to investigate the role played by these enzymes in the pathophysiology of male subfertility. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present study was performed in 41 semen samples from normal donors and in 52 semen samples and ten testicle biopsies from patients who were being evaluated for causes of subfertility. RESULTS Immunohistochemical analyses showed high levels of PON1 and PON3 expression in testicular tissue. PON2 expression was also detected, albeit at weaker levels. Oxidative stress indicators in biopsies were low and localized in some specific areas of the seminiferous tubules. PON1 was detected in seminal fluid at very low levels but with no significant differences between patients and controls. Receiver‐operating characteristic analysis showed a low diagnostic power of semen PON1 levels. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows high protein expression levels of PON1, PON2 and PON3 in testicular cells. The concentrations and activities of PON1 in semen are negligible and are probably the result of cellular catabolism, with no significant biological function in the testes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09888.x