Single‐subject research designs in pediatric rehabilitation: a valuable step towards knowledge translation
Knowledge translation may be particularly challenging in pediatric rehabilitation, where study findings are often ambiguous owing to low statistical power or inconsistent responses to intervention. Disconnection between research protocols and clinical practicality, as well as variability of responsi...
Saved in:
Published in | Developmental medicine and child neurology Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 574 - 580 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.06.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Knowledge translation may be particularly challenging in pediatric rehabilitation, where study findings are often ambiguous owing to low statistical power or inconsistent responses to intervention. Disconnection between research protocols and clinical practicality, as well as variability of responsiveness in heterogeneous pediatric populations, may further impede integration of research findings into everyday practice. Use of single‐subject research designs (SSRDs) may bridge the gap between research and practice, with robust design options that better identify and preserve patterns of responsiveness to specific interventions and offer protocols that are more readily implemented in practice settings than can be done in traditional randomized controlled trials. This review defines SSRD, provides examples of research questions that can be answered using SSRD, details the experimental designs that can be used and the level of evidence of each design, and describes statistical analysis approaches and clinical application. This analysis will aid researchers, reviewers, clinicians, and others in better understanding SSRD methodology and its application in everyday practice.
What this paper adds
Single‐subject research designs (SSRDs) preserve variability of individual responses to care, with designs and levels of evidence relative to robustness of experimental control and quality of implementation.
N‐of‐1 trials (or other SSRDs) may be used to decide the best treatment protocol for an individual patient without bias. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0012-1622 1469-8749 1469-8749 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dmcn.13405 |