Correspondence assertions for process synchronization in concurrent communications

High-level specification of patterns of communications such as protocols can be modeled elegantly by means of session types (Honda et al., 1998). However, a number of examples suggest that session types fall short when finer precision on protocol specification is required. In order to increase the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of functional programming Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 219 - 247
Main Authors BONELLI, EDUARDO, COMPAGNONI, ADRIANA, GUNTER, ELSA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.03.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:High-level specification of patterns of communications such as protocols can be modeled elegantly by means of session types (Honda et al., 1998). However, a number of examples suggest that session types fall short when finer precision on protocol specification is required. In order to increase the expressiveness of session types we appeal to the theory of correspondence assertions (Clarke & Marrero, 1998; Gordon & Jeffrey, 2003b). The resulting type discipline augments the types of long-term channels with effects and thus yields types which may depend on messages read or written earlier within the same session. This new type system can be used to check: source of information,whether data is propagated as specified across multiple parties,if there are unspecified communications between parties, andif the data being exchanged has been modified by the code in an unspecified way. We prove that evaluation preserves typability and that well-typed processes are safe. Also, we illustrate how the resulting theory allows us to address shortcomings present in the pure theory of session types.
Bibliography:PII:S095679680400543X
istex:2DFB27CC23D35AF46B4F3EB0AA8A56116B82E0DD
ark:/67375/6GQ-NZTJMK7S-R
ISSN:0956-7968
1469-7653
DOI:10.1017/S095679680400543X