The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review

• Published in: Brain sciences Vol. 12; no. 11; p. 1446
• Main Authors: Schoustra, Emily, van Maanen, Peter, den Haan, Chantal, Ravesloot, Madeline J. L., de Vries, Nico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 26.10.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Apnea; Clinical trials; Meta-analysis; nasal surgery; nose; obstructive sleep apnea; Otolaryngology; Patients; Quality control; Sinuses; Sleep and wakefulness; Sleep apnea; Sleep disorders; Standard deviation; Surgery; Systematic Review
• ISSN: 2076-3425; 2076-3425
• DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111446

Purpose: Nasal obstruction is believed to play a significant role in the pathophysiology and management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, controversy remains about the ability of isolated nasal surgery to improve OSA. The objective of this systematic review is to give an updated overview of the literature on whether isolated nasal surgery can improve OSA subjectively (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) and/or objectively (polysomnography (PSG)). Methods: A systematic review was performed searching the electronic databases PubMed, Embase.com (accessed on 20 June 2022) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 20 June 2022. Eligible studies were reviewed for methodological quality using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the included studies reported no significant reduction in the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) after isolated nasal surgery in patients with OSA. The meta-analysis suggests that the AHI slightly decreases after nasal surgery. The ESS was significantly lower after nasal surgery in eighteen studies. Conclusion: Based on the present analysis of objective outcomes, isolated nasal surgery did not improve the AHI significantly in the majority of the studies. The meta-analysis suggests a slight decrease in AHI after nasal surgery, but this reduction is not clinically relevant in terms of treatment success. Isolated nasal surgery should therefore not be recommended as a first-line treatment for OSA. Because of high study heterogeneity, these results should be interpreted with caution. Isolated nasal surgery can possibly improve OSA subjectively. Perhaps only OSA patients with complaints of nasal obstruction or OSA patients experiencing difficulty with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compliance would benefit from isolated nasal surgery.