A comparison of elevated blood lead levels among children living in foster care, their siblings, and the general population

• Published in: Pediatrics (Evanston) Vol. 107; no. 5; p. E81
• Main Authors: Chung, E K, Webb, D, Clampet-Lundquist, S, Campbell, C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2001
• Subjects: Child; Child Welfare; Child, Preschool; Female; Foster Home Care - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Infant; Lead - blood; Lead Poisoning - epidemiology; Lead Poisoning - prevention & control; Logistic Models; Male; Nuclear Family; Philadelphia - epidemiology; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Statistics, Nonparametric; Philadelphia
• ISSN: 1098-4275
• DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.5.e81

To assess the prevalence of elevated blood lead levels (EBLLs) among children before and after foster care placement, and to compare the prevalence of EBLLs among children in foster care with that of their siblings and the general population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative databases from the Philadelphia Department of Human Services and the Birth Certificate Registry and the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program at the Philadelphia Department of Public Health. Logistic regression analyses were performed to control for confounding variables, including age, race, gender, and the year, seasonal timing, and source (capillary vs venous) of test. From June 1992 to May 1997, there were 1824 children in foster care with available blood lead results in the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program database. Of these, 519 (28%) had initial lead screening before foster care placement and 654 (36%) after placement. There were 821 siblings and 73 608 children in the general population with available blood lead results. Before entering foster care, children were nearly twice as likely to have EBLLs as their siblings (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4, 2.0), those in placement (adjusted OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.6, 2.2), and the general population (adjusted OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.5, 2.0). At the highest point prevalence, 50% of children before placement had lead levels >/=20 microg/dL, and nearly 90% had levels >/=10 microg/dL. For all age categories, siblings of children in foster care placement had a higher prevalence of EBLLs than did the general population. After placement, children in foster care were nearly half as likely as the other groups to have EBLLs. Our findings suggest that children are at high risk for lead poisoning before entering foster care and that placement in foster care may have a beneficial effect on lead exposure. Children before foster care placement are nearly twice as likely to have EBLLs compared with children in foster care placement, the general population, and their siblings. Furthermore, siblings of children in foster care are at high risk for lead poisoning. Children receiving social services in their own homes and children suffering from abuse and neglect should be actively screened for lead poisoning. Greater efforts at preventing lead poisoning among these children must be made.