Dynamic thermal performance of three types of unfired earth bricks

•Dynamic thermal performances were examined as function of wall thickness.•Earthen wall cannot achieve the required level of building insulation.•The ideal thickness ensuring optimum thermal inertia is determined.•An earthen wall can achieve the optimum thermal inertia with a 0.3 m of thickness. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied thermal engineering Vol. 93; pp. 377 - 383
Main Authors El Fgaier, Fayçal, Lafhaj, Zoubeir, Antczak, Emmanuel, Chapiseau, Christophe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 25.01.2016
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Dynamic thermal performances were examined as function of wall thickness.•Earthen wall cannot achieve the required level of building insulation.•The ideal thickness ensuring optimum thermal inertia is determined.•An earthen wall can achieve the optimum thermal inertia with a 0.3 m of thickness. The present work aims at studying the thermophysical properties of three types of unfired earth bricks through experimental investigation, and their dynamic thermal performance (thermal capacity, decrement factor and thermal lag) as a function of wall thickness. The objective is to determine the ideal thickness of a raw earth wall, built by these bricks, to achieve the optimum values of thermal inertia. These bricks were industrially produced by the Briqueteries du Nord, which is a factory located in the north of France. The process used was the extrusion. The main difference between the three types of bricks is the origin of the soils, which were extracted from various quarries. They were characterised to determine their physical, chemical and geotechnical properties, and to identify their impact on development and production of unfired earth bricks. This work has identified the optimum thickness of the wall built by these unfired earth bricks. (It was 0.3 m for two types of bricks and for the other one was 0.4 m.) This thickness ensures the greatest heat capacity and a thermal lag between 10 and 12 hours, while taking into account the quantity of bricks necessary for the construction of such a wall and the habitable area.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1359-4311
1873-5606
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.009