Effects of coumaphos on locomotor activities of different honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) subspecies and ecotypes

• Published in: Apidologie Vol. 54; no. 4
• Main Authors: Arslan, Okan Can, Erdem, Babür, Somel, Mehmet, GIRAY, Tugrul, Kence, Meral
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Springer Paris 01.08.2023; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Verlag
• Subjects: Acaricides; Apiculture; Beekeeping; Bees; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Coumaphos; Ecotypes; Entomology; Insecticides; Life Sciences; Locomotor activity; Monitoring systems; Original Article; Sucrose; Syrup; Learning; Acaricides; Acetylcholinesterase (AChE); ); Coumaphos; Honey bee; Varroa destructor; Honey bee (Apis mellifera)
• ISSN: 0044-8435; 1297-9678
• DOI: 10.1007/s13592-023-01017-9

The effects of acute sublethal doses of coumaphos, an acaricide used against Varroa destructor infestation in beekeeping, on the locomotor activities of four native honeybee subspecies of Türkiye including two ecotypes (Carniolan honeybee - A. m. carnica , Syrian honeybee - A. m. syriaca , Caucasian honeybee- A. m. caucasica , and Muğla and Yığılca ecotypes of Anatolian honeybee A. m. anatoliaca ) were investigated using an individual locomotor activity monitoring system. Analysis of locomotor activity data in the first 12-h, last 12-h, and 24-h time periods showed that bees from caucasica and carnica subspecies were not affected by coumaphos at all three acute doses (1, 2, and 5 μg coumaphos in 10 μl sucrose syrup for each bee). In contrast, bees from A. m. syriaca subspecies showed significantly elevated locomotor activity levels at 2 and 5 μg coumaphos doses within the first 12 h. Bees from both Muğla and Yığılca ecotypes of anatoliaca subspecies also showed elevated locomotor activity levels at 5 μg coumaphos dose but the magnitude of increase was lower in these ecotypes compared to that seen in syriaca subspecies in the first 12-h period. In general, increasing doses of coumaphos resulted in increased locomotor activity (locomotor activity), with differences in sensitivity across honeybee populations. Possible mechanisms underlying this variance and suggestions for further studies are discussed.