Environmental impact of the diet of young Portuguese and its relationship with adherence to the Mediterranean Diet

• Published in: European journal of nutrition Vol. 63; no. 6; pp. 2307 - 2315
• Main Authors: Álvarez-Álvarez, Laura, Vitelli-Storelli, Facundo, Rubín-García, María, Martín-Sánchez, Vicente, García Fernández, Camino, Carvalho, Catarina, Araújo, Joana, Ramos, Elisabete
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acidification; Carbon dioxide; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Diet; Emissions; Environmental factors; Environmental impact; Epidemiology; Eutrophication; Food consumption; Food intake; Greenhouse gases; Land use; Nutrition; Original Contribution; Regression analysis; Climate change; Environmental sustainability; Sustainable food; Healthy dietary pattern
• ISSN: 1436-6207; 1436-6215; 1436-6215
• DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03396-w

Objective To estimate, in a cohort of young Portuguese adults, the environmental impact (greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, land use, energy used, acidification and potential eutrophication) of diet according to adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD). Methods Data from 1554 participants of the Epidemiologic Health Investigation of Teenagers in Porto (EPITeen) were analysed. Food intake and MD adherence were determined using validated questionnaires. The environmental impact was evaluated with the EAT-Lancet Commission tables, and the link between MD adherence and environmental impact was calculated using adjusted multivariate linear regression models. Results Higher adherence (high vs. low) to the MD was associated with lower environmental impact in terms of land use (7.8 vs. 8.5 m 2 , p = 0.002), potential acidification (57.8 vs. 62.4 g SO2-eq, p = 0.001) and eutrophication (21.7 vs. 23.5 g PO4-eq, p < 0.001). Energy use decreased only in the calorie-adjusted model (9689.5 vs. 10,265.9 kJ, p < 0.001), and GHG emissions were reduced only in a complementary model where fish consumption was eliminated (3035.3 vs. 3281.2 g CO2-eq, p < 0.001). Meat products had the greatest environmental impact for all five environmental factors analysed: 35.7% in GHG emissions, 60.9% in energy use, 72.8% in land use, 70% in acidification and 61.8% in eutrophication. Conclusions Higher adherence to the MD is associated with lower environmental impact, particularly in terms of acidification, eutrophication, and land use. Reducing meat consumption can contribute to greater environmental sustainability.