Induction of estrus in non-lactating dairy goats with different estrous synchrony protocols
The objective of this study was to evaluate two protocols of estrous synchronization in non-lactating Toggenburg goats. Nineteen goats were allocated, according to body condition score and weight, into two groups (A and B) and evaluated utilizing two treatments (T1 and T2). Animals in the T1 and T2...
Saved in:
Published in | Animal reproduction science Vol. 85; no. 1; pp. 117 - 124 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The objective of this study was to evaluate two protocols of estrous synchronization in non-lactating Toggenburg goats. Nineteen goats were allocated, according to body condition score and weight, into two groups (A and B) and evaluated utilizing two treatments (T1 and T2). Animals in the T1 and T2 groups received an intravaginal sponge (day 0) containing 60
mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for 6 and 9 days, respectively, plus 200
IU equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) and 22.5
μg cloprostenol 24
h before sponge removal. Females were bred only at the second estrus and received 22.5
μg cloprostenol 7 days later to prevent pregnancy. Percentages of animals in estrus did not differ (
P>0.05) between T1 (89.5%) and T2 (84.2%). From 33 females in estrus (T1+T2), 28 (84.8%), 2 (6.1%), and 3 (9.1%) were identified in estrus at 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00
h, respectively. Additionally, 6 (18.2%), 0 (0.0%) and 27 (81.8%) were no longer detected to be on estrus at 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00
h, respectively. Interval from sponge removal and the onset of estrus (IE) did not differ (
P>0.05) between T1 (46.1±15.0
h) and T2 (53.6±16.1
h). Duration of estrus did not differ (
P>0.05) between T1 (30.0±12.0
h) and T2 (27.2±11.2
h). Both protocols were effective in inducing estrus in non-lactating goats. The onset and end of the estrus relative to hour of the day should be considered in estrous detection, natural breeding, and artificial insemination in goats. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-4320 1873-2232 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.03.005 |