Zoledronic Acid Effectively Prevents Aromatase Inhibitor–Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole: Z-FAST Study 36-Month Follow-up Results

• Published in: Clinical breast cancer Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 77 - 85
• Main Authors: Brufsky, Adam M, Bosserman, Linda D, Caradonna, Richard R, Haley, Barbara B, Jones, C. Michael, Moore, Halle C.F, Jin, Lixian, Warsi, Ghulam M, Ericson, Solveig G, Perez, Edith A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2009
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aromatase Inhibitors - adverse effects; Bisphosphonates; Bone Density - drug effects; Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use; Bone mineral density; Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy; Diphosphonates - therapeutic use; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Humans; Imidazoles - therapeutic use; Middle Aged; N-telopeptide; Neoplasm Staging; Nitriles - adverse effects; Obstetrics and Gynecology; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - chemically induced; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy; Prognosis; Survival Rate; T score; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles - adverse effects; Bone mineral density; Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; N-telopeptide; Bisphosphonates; T score
• ISSN: 1526-8209; 1938-0666
• DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2009.n.015

Abstract Background Postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are at risk for accelerated bone loss and subsequent fractures. The ongoing Zometa-Femara Adjuvant Synergy Trial (Z-FAST) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in preventing such bone loss. Patients and Methods In this multicenter study, postmenopausal women with early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole were randomized to receive up-front or delayed-start zoledronic acid (ZA; 4 mg intravenously every 6 months) for 5 years. Delayed-start ZA was administered if the lumbar spine (LS) or total hip (TH) T score fell below −2.0 or a nontraumatic fracture occurred. The primary endpoint was to compare the change from baseline in LS bone mineral density (BMD) between groups at month 12; secondary endpoints, measured at other predetermined timepoints, included comparing changes in TH BMD, LS BMD, and markers of bone turnover, fracture incidence, and time to disease recurrence. Herein, we report the results of the 36-month interim analysis. Results Overall, 301 patients were randomized to each group. At month 36, the absolute difference in mean LS and TH BMDs between the up-front and delayed groups was 6.7% and 5.2%, respectively ( P < .0001 for both). Although this study was not designed to show antifracture efficacy, the incidence of fractures was slightly higher in the delayed group (up-front, 17 [5.7%] vs. delayed, 19 [6.3%]) but not statistically significant ( P = .8638). Pyrexia (27 [9%] vs. 6 [2%]; P = .0002) and bone pain (39 [13%] vs. 20 [6.7%]; P = .01) were more common in up-front patients; cough (13 [4.3%] vs. 27 [9%]; P = .03) was more common in delayed patients. No severe renal dysfunction or confirmed cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported. Disease recurrence was reported in 9 up-front (3.0%) and 16 delayed (5.3%) patients (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = .127), with an absolute decrease of 2.3%. Conclusion Up-front ZA more effectively prevents AI-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer than delaying therapy until substantial bone loss or fracture occurs.