Effects of Pruning on Vegetation Growth and Soil Properties in Poplar Plantations

• Published in: Forests Vol. 14; no. 3; p. 501
• Main Authors: Huang, Kaidong, Xu, Cheng, Qian, Zhuangzhuang, Zhang, Kang, Tang, Luozhong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2023
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Biomass; Efficiency; Environmental aspects; Enzymatic activity; Enzyme activity; Enzymes; Growth; Growth conditions; Hardwoods; Investigations; Laboratories; Measurement; Microorganisms; Multidimensional scaling; Nitrogen; Nutrients; Plant communities; Plantations; Plot (Narrative); Poplar; poplar plantation; Pruning; Redundancy; Seasonal variations; Soil investigations; Soil nutrients; Soil properties; Soils; Trees; Understory; understory vegetation; Urease; Vegetation; Vegetation growth; China; Germany
• ISSN: 1999-4907; 1999-4907
• DOI: 10.3390/f14030501

Artificial pruning is an important silvicultural practice that can produce clear wood in poplar plantations. This study focused on the growth of poplar, understory vegetation diversity and soil properties in response to different pruning intensities in poplar plantations. We implemented three different pruning treatments based on the height-to-crown base (HCB) to tree height (H) ratio in Populus deltoides ‘Nanlin 3804′ plantations: CK (no pruning), a 1/3 pruning treatment and a 1/2 pruning treatment. The poplar growth conditions, understory vegetation biodiversity and soil properties were investigated for one year after pruning. Compared with CK, the 1/2 pruning treatment significantly decreased the increment of diameter at breast height (DBHi) and stem volume increment (Vi) by 16.4% and 12.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, pruning significantly promoted understory vegetation biomass and increased the Shannon–Weiner diversity index of understory vegetation, and these variables were positively correlated with pruning intensity. The 1/2 pruning treatment significantly reduced the contents of soil nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), total inorganic nitrogen (IN) and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) by 21.9%, 13.9% and 22.4%, respectively. However, the 1/3 pruning treatment had no significant influence. Pruning mainlyaffectedthe soil enzyme activity in the surface (0–10 cm) layer. The 1/3 and 1/2 pruning treatments significantly decreased soil urease activity by 20.1% and 15.0%, respectively. Furthermore, nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis showed that the seasonal variation in soil properties was significant, and significant differences among pruning treatments were mainly observed in July and October. Redundancy analysis showed that the growth of aboveground vegetation was significantly correlated with soil properties, particularly soil IN content and urease activity. Therefore, the results highlighted that pruning could promote the growth of understory vegetation and accelerate the transformation of soil nutrients. The 1/2 pruning treatment significantly inhibited the growth of poplar in terms of DBH and V, while the 1/3 pruning treatment promoted the growth of poplar in the short term. Overall, we think that the 1/3 pruning intensity is more suitable for pruning practice.