Identification of Stop Criteria for Large-Scale Laboratory Slab Tests Using Digital Image Correlation and Acoustic Emission

• Published in: Infrastructures (Basel) Vol. 7; no. 3; p. 36
• Main Authors: Christensen, Christian Overgaard, Zhang, Fengqiao, Garnica, Gabriela Zarate, Lantsoght, Eva Olivia Leontien, Goltermann, Per, Schmidt, Jacob Wittrup
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2022
• Subjects: acoustic emission; Acoustic emission testing; Acoustics; Concrete; concrete slab bridges; Concrete slabs; crack evaluation; Criteria; Damage detection; digital image correlation; Digital imaging; Emission analysis; Emissions control; Field tests; Identification; Laboratories; Load; Load tests; Localization; Methodology; Methods; Monitoring; Monitoring systems; proof-loading; Qualitative analysis; Reinforced concrete; stop criteria; T section; Test procedures
• ISSN: 2412-3811; 2412-3811
• DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures7030036

Advanced monitoring methods are required to identify stop criteria in proof-load tests. In this study, the combined methodology of two-dimensional digital image correlation and acoustic emission is investigated for its applicability for future implementation in field tests. The two monitoring systems are deemed to provide valuable insight with external measurements from digital image correlation and internal measurements from acoustic emission. Two overturned T-section reinforced concrete slabs (0.37 × 1.7 × 8.4 m) tested under laboratory conditions are used for the assessment. The first slab test served as a preliminary test to enable sensor placement and creation of a relevant loading protocol. The main scientific results lead to a proposal for a test procedure using the combined methodology based on results, observations, and experiences from an individual stop criteria assessment for the two methods. The results include full-field plots, an investigation of the time of crack detection and monitoring of crack widths with digital image correlation, and a qualitative assessment of activity vs. load followed by a quantitative evaluation of calm ratios using acoustic emission. The individual results show that both digital image correlation and acoustic emission can identify damage occurrence earlier than other secondary methods. At crack detection (415 kN), crack widths were measured at widths between 0.078 mm to 0.125 mm and can be monitored until reaching the stop criterion at 463 kN (Eurocode SLS threshold of wmax = 0.2 mm). The acoustic emission results were limited by the pre-defined loading protocol and thus, only indicated that damage occurred sometime between 300 kN and 500 kN (pre-defined load levels). Therefore, the proposal for test procedure involves a methodology, where the loading protocol may be updated during testing based on monitoring results and thus provide even more valuable data.