QT Interval Dispersion in Healthy Subjects and Survivors of Sudden Cardiac Death: Circadian Variation in a Twenty-Four-Hour Assessment

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology Vol. 79; no. 9; pp. 1190 - 1193
• Main Authors: Molnar, MD, Janos, Rosenthal, MD, James E., Weiss, MS, Jerry S., Somberg, MD, John C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.05.1997; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac dysrhythmias; Cardiology. Vascular system; Cardiovascular disease; Circadian Rhythm - physiology; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Health care; Heart; Heart Arrest - diagnosis; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Patients; Resuscitation; Human; QT interval; Arrhythmia; Survivor; Sudden death; Cardiovascular disease; Circadian rhythm; Excitability disorder; Dispersion; Ventricular fibrillation; Electrodiagnosis; Heart disease; Risk factor; Electrocardiography; Ambulatory; Monitoring
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00080-5

Twenty-four-hour acquisition of QT dispersion (QTd) from the Holter and the circadian variation of QTd were evaluated in 20 survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD), in 20 healthy subjects, and in 14 control patients without a history of cardiac arrest who were age, sex, diagnosis and therapy matched to 14 SCD patients. Computer-assisted QT measurements were performed on 24-hour Holter recordings; each recording was divided into 288 5-minute segments and templates representing the average QRST were generated. QTd was calculated as the difference between QT intervals in leads V 1 and V 5 for each template on Holter. The 24-hour mean QTd was significantly greater in SCD patients (40 ± 28 ms) than in healthy subjects (20 ± 10 ms) and control patients (15 ± 5 ms) (p <0.05). There was a circadian variation in QTd with greater values at night (0 to 6 a. m.) than at daytime (10 a. m. to 4 p. m.) in healthy subjects (25 ± 13 vs 15 ± 8 ms, p <0.001) and control patients (18 ± 10 vs 12 ± 4 ms p <0.05), whereas in SCD patients there was no significant difference between night and day values (45 ± 31 vs 37 ± 28 ms, p = NS). It is concluded that QTd measured by Holter was greater in SCD patients than in healthy subjects and matched control patients during the entire day. QTd has a clear circadian variation in normal subjects, whereas this variation is blunted in SCD patients. QTd measured on Holter differentiates survivors of cardiac arrest and may be a useful tool for risk stratification.