Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides

The emission of nutrients and pesticides from agricultural soils endangers natural habitats. Here, we review to which extent carbon-rich organic amendments help to retain nutrients and pesticides in agricultural soils and to reduce the contamination of surrounding areas and groundwater. We compare s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 751; p. 141607
Main Authors Siedt, Martin, Schäffer, Andreas, Smith, Kilian E.C., Nabel, Moritz, Roß-Nickoll, Martina, van Dongen, Joost T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 10.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The emission of nutrients and pesticides from agricultural soils endangers natural habitats. Here, we review to which extent carbon-rich organic amendments help to retain nutrients and pesticides in agricultural soils and to reduce the contamination of surrounding areas and groundwater. We compare straw, compost, and biochar to see whether biochar outperforms the other two more traditional and cheaper materials. We present a list of criteria to evaluate the suitability of organic materials to be used as soil amendments and discuss differences in elemental compositions of straw, compost, and biochar to understand, how soil microorganisms utilize those materials. We review their effects on physical and chemical soil characteristics, soil microbial communities, as well as effects on the transformation and retention of nutrients and pesticides in detail. It becomes clear that for all three amendments their effects can vary greatly depending on numerous aspects, such as the type of soil, application rate, and production procedure of the organic material. Biochar is most effective in increasing the sorption capacity of soils but does not outperform straw and compost with regards to the other aspects investigated. Nevertheless, the possibility to design biochar properties makes it a very promising material. Finally, we provide critical comments about how to make studies about organic amendments more comparable (comprehensive provision of material properties), how to improve concepts of future work (meta-analysis, long-term field studies, use of deep-insight microbial DNA sequencing), and what needs to be further investigated (the link between structural and functional microbial parameters, the impact of biochar on pesticide efficiency). [Display omitted] •Organic amendments have multiple beneficial effects in soils structure and function.•Biochar outperforms straw and compost only with regards to sorption.•Comparability criteria for experimental studies are recommended (C, N, H, pH, etc.).•Constant laboratory conditions often mask amendment effects in soils.•DNA sequencing methods are needed to better understand microbial communities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607