A Simple Method for Estimating Field Crop Evapotranspiration from Pot Experiments

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 12; p. 1823
• Main Authors: Lu, Yunxuan, Ma, Donghao, Chen, Xiaomin, Zhang, Jiabao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2018
• Subjects: Accuracy; Biomass; Corn; crop transpiration; Crops; Estimation; Evaporation; Evapotranspiration; Experiments; Fertilizers; field scale; Loam soils; lysimeter; Lysimeters; Meteorological data; Methods; Moisture content; Precipitation; Productivity; Seasons; Seeds; Soil conditions; Soil moisture; Transpiration; upscaling; Water; Wheat; wheat-maize; Winter wheat; China
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w10121823

Pot experiments are a low-cost and easy-to-use technique for studies of soil evaporation and plant transpiration in controlled environments. However, little attention has been paid to the applicability of evapotranspiration (ET) measured in pot experiments to the field. The objective of this study was to determine whether a pot experiment can be used for measuring field ET. Evapotranspiration experiments with winter wheat and summer maize were conducted in pots and lysimeters under various water-deficit conditions. The measured ET values in the pot experiments under different water conditions were considerably different from those of the lysimeters. Causes of such differences in ET were analyzed, and a series of corrections were proposed to eliminate the effects of different crop densities, representative areas per plant, and soil moisture conditions on pot experiment results. After these corrections, the discrepancy in the total ET of wheat-maize seasons between pots and lysimeters was greatly reduced from a maximum of 117% to only approximately 10%. The relative mean square errors (RMSEs) for daily ET values also decreased from a maximum value of 4.56 mm to less than 1.5 mm for the wheat season and from a maximum value of 6.02 mm to approximately 2 mm for the maize season. Possible measures were proposed to further improve the accuracy of the corrected ET obtained from pot experiments. In sum, pot experiments can serve as a feasible tool for estimating ET in the field just with a few routine measurements at regions where large-scale weighing lysimeters, an eddy covariance device, and even meteorological data are not available. The proposed corrections can also be used for upscaling small-scale ET measurements to a large scale.