Water Level Forecasting Using Deep Learning Time-Series Analysis: A Case Study of Red River of the North

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 12; p. 1971
• Main Authors: Atashi, Vida, Gorji, Hamed Taheri, Shahabi, Seyed Mojtaba, Kardan, Ramtin, Lim, Yeo Howe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2022
• Subjects: Algorithms; Case studies; Dams; Data mining; Deep learning; Discharge measurement; Economic impact; Flood damage; Flood forecasting; flood prediction; Flood predictions; Floods; Floodwater; Forecasting; Gaging stations; Geological surveys; Hydrology; Long short-term memory; Loss reduction; LSTM; Machine learning; Precipitation; Predictions; Rain; Red River; Regression analysis; Rivers; SARIMA; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Statistics; Storm damage; Stream discharge; Stream flow; System effectiveness; Time series; Topography; water level; Water levels; Canada; North Dakota; Manitoba Canada; Red River; United States > US
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w14121971

The Red River of the North is vulnerable to floods, which have caused significant damage and economic loss to inhabitants. A better capability in flood-event prediction is essential to decision-makers for planning flood-loss-reduction strategies. Over the last decades, classical statistical methods and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have greatly contributed to the growth of data-driven forecasting systems that provide cost-effective solutions and improved performance in simulating the complex physical processes of floods using mathematical expressions. To make improvements to flood prediction for the Red River of the North, this paper presents effective approaches that make use of a classical statistical method, a classical ML algorithm, and a state-of-the-art Deep Learning method. Respectively, the methods are seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA), Random Forest (RF), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). We used hourly level records from three U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), at Pembina, Drayton, and Grand Forks stations with twelve years of data (2007–2019), to evaluate the water level at six hours, twelve hours, one day, three days, and one week in advance. Pembina, at the downstream location, has a water level gauge but not a flow-gauging station, unlike the others. The floodwater-level-prediction results show that the LSTM method outperforms the SARIMA and RF methods. For the one-week-ahead prediction, the RMSE values for Pembina, Drayton, and Grand Forks are 0.190, 0.151, and 0.107, respectively. These results demonstrate the high precision of the Deep Learning algorithm as a reliable choice for flood-water-level prediction.