Estimation of breast height diameter and trunk curvature with linear and single-photon LiDARs

• Published in: Annals of forest science. Vol. 78; no. 3
• Main Authors: Ahola, Jari M., Heikkilä, Tapio, Raitila, Jyrki, Sipola, Teemu, Tenhunen, Jussi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Springer Paris 01.09.2021; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)
• Subjects: Agricultural sciences; Avalanche diodes; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Curvature; Diameters; Environment; Forestry; Forestry Management; Lidar; Life Sciences; Measurement methods; New technology; Photon avalanches; Photons; Pine trees; Pinus sylvestris; Prototypes; Quality management; Research Paper; Silviculture, forestry; Terrestrial environments; Tree Biology; Trees; Wood Science & Technology; Single-photon LiDAR; Forest inventory
• ISSN: 1286-4560; 1297-966X
• DOI: 10.1007/s13595-021-01100-0

Key message New technologies can take us towards real precision forestry: the terrestrial single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has a great potential to outperform conventional linear mode LiDARs in measuring tree parameters at the stand level. Context Precision forestry together with new sensor technologies implies Digital Forest Inventories for estimation of volume and quality of trees in a stand. Aims This study compared commercial LiDAR, new prototype SPAD LiDAR, and manual methods for measuring tree quality attributes, i.e., diameter at breast height (DBH) and trunk curvature in the forest stand. Methods We measured 7 Scots pine trees ( Pinus sylvestris ) with commercial LiDAR (Zeb Horizon by GeoSLAM), prototype SPAD LiDAR, and manual devices. We compared manual measurements to the DBH and curvature values estimated based on LiDAR data. We also scanned a densely branched Picea abies to compare penetrability of the LiDARs and detectability of the obstructed trunk. Results The DBH values deviated 1–3 cm correlating to the specified accuracies of the employed devices, showing close to acceptable results. The curvature values deviated 1–6 cm implying distorted range measurements from the top part of the trunks and inaccurate manual measurement method, leaving space for improvement. The most important finding was that the SPAD LiDAR outperformed conventional LiDAR in detecting tree stem of the densely branched spruce. Conclusion These results represent preliminary but clear evidence that LiDAR technologies are already close to acceptable level in DBH measurements, but not yet satisfactory for curvature measurements. In addition, terrestrial SPAD LiDAR has a great potential to outperform conventional LiDARs in forest measurements of densely branched trees.