Comparison between gas puffing and supersonic molecular beam injection in plasma density feedback experiments in EAST

To achieve desirable plasma density control, a supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI) feedback control system has been developed recently for the EAST tokamak. The performance of the SMBI and gas puffing (GP) feedback systems were used and compared. The performance of pulse width mode is better...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlasma physics and controlled fusion Vol. 55; no. 11; pp. 115010 - 5
Main Authors Zheng, Xingwei, Li, Jiangang, Hu, Jiansheng, Li, Jiahong, Ding, Rui, Cao, Bin, Wu, Jinhua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IOP Publishing 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To achieve desirable plasma density control, a supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI) feedback control system has been developed recently for the EAST tokamak. The performance of the SMBI and gas puffing (GP) feedback systems were used and compared. The performance of pulse width mode is better than that of pulse amplitude mode when GP was used for density feedback control. During one-day experiments, the variation of gas input and wall retention can be clarified into two stages. In the first stage the retention ratio is as high as 80-90%, and the gas input is about an order of 1022 D2. However, in the second stage, the retention ratio is at a range of 50-70%. The gas input of a single discharge is small and the net wall retention grows slowly. The results of the SMBI feedback control experiment was analyzed. The shorter delay time of SMBI makes it faster at feeding back control the plasma density. The result showed that, compared with GP, the gas input of SMBI was decreased ∼30% and the wall retention was reduced ∼40%. This shows SMBI's advantage for the long pulse high density discharges in EAST.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0741-3335
1361-6587
DOI:10.1088/0741-3335/55/11/115010